Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | callamdelaney's commentslogin

Apparently what comes after git is git

More likely the llm misinterpreted something and hallucinated an error. Just yesterday Claude code hallucinated itself an infinite loop.

Typical microsoft

The reason we buy macbooks is because they aren't touchscreens.

That would make British people less poor for once so they decided against it. Managed economic decline and mass immigration go hand in hand with globalism and ‘global warming’ extremists.


Yeah as if Europe doesn't have Oil it isn't exploiting because of renewable legislation..


Europe simply does not have enough known oil reserves to put a dent in current prices even if it exploited them all.

There may still be good arguments to do so anyway, such as it being less carbon intensive than importing oil, but there is absolutely no magic lever we can pull that would fix this problem that we're just not pulling due to renewables legislation.


Britain could start extracting oil from its European fields instead of just buying the same oil and gas from Denmark. Sanctions could be lifted on Russian oil. Duties could be dropped. There are levers.


> Sanctions could be lifted on Russian oil

I'd rather freeze.


There’s very little oil and gas left in the UK part of the North Sea

The Tories granted over a hundred licenses for exploration in the last ten years and so far it’s led to the supply of one months gas consumption

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/mar/28/north-sea-o...


The guardian would say that to be fair


So do you have evidence that those North Sea licenses produced more oil and gas?

The Guardian’s report is based on someone else’s research, they didn't just make up the story… they’re not the Daily Mail…


Sure just send the continental german army straight for the oil fields, worked out great last time.


What on earth is the point? This is like saying you’re running wordpress on a vps? So what?


I shove everything in memory, it's a design decision. Memory is still cheap, relatively.


How is walking over a road without a light inconveniencing anyone? I’ll cross the road when it’s clear. I don’t blast music in public places though.


> How is walking over a road without a light inconveniencing anyone?

They said “walk out into traffic.” That’s rude. You should wait for a signal or a break in the flow so nobody has to brake for you.


I never see this being an issue. On the other hand I often see cars blast by stop signs without stopping or ignore marked crosswalks with passengers inside.

No wonder pedestrian deaths are up so much the past few years


Walking into traffic in an undesignated crossing is rude (and illegal). Likewise with trying to cross at an intersection when traffic has the green light.

But when there’s a designated crossing area, it’s the responsibility of traffic to stop. Pedestrians should not stand and wait at the intersection for a break in traffic because it’s a confusing signal to drivers. If you’re standing at a designated crosswalk you need to be either signaling your intent to cross or moving away from the crosswalk


Getting pedantic now but depending on the circumstances the traffic is supposed to have stopped for you.

Assuming there is no paint on the road an (unmarked) crosswalk may still exist [1] and drivers are supposed to yield to a pedestrian in a marked or unmarked crosswalk [2].

[1]: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio....

[2]: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio...


Getting more pedantic, less than 1pct of the population is in California.

Pretty clear parent meant people who cross against the light / mid-block when there is a crossing 50ft away / stepping in front of the one car on the road when they could look up for one second and step out behind that car etc. in other words the people who put off 'main character' vibes.


Getting pedantic here, "no light / crosswalk" means no crosswalk, painted or not.


Except it doesn't.

Legally there is a crosswalk regardless of if it's painted or not see [1]. I get this wasn't on the drivers test but it's still in the law.

There were some complaints about not everybody living in California. It's a law in your state too; I'm not going to find it for you.

[1]: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySectio...


It’s going over your head. He’s talking about certain people.


Depending on where you live it may not really be relatable to you, but living in NYC -- there are people that will intentionally jay walk on a green light and even _stare you down_ knowing that you will stop and let them pass.

People jay walk when there's no traffic all the time, that's totally fine. This is a totally different act of passive aggression.


> Depending on where you live it may not really be relatable to you, but living in NYC -- there are people that will intentionally jay walk on a green light and even _stare you down_ knowing that you will stop and let them pass.

This is the speed walking equivalent of picking up pennies in front of a steam roller. Saves a min here and then until you pay for it big time.


They are often happily blinded by ideology. Try to tell someone in Britain that wages have been seriously suppressed due to mass immigration and most of them will look at you like you’re stupid.


Immigration is not so obvious. Each immigrant contributes to both supply and demand.


Yes, supply of workers and demand for houses. So not only is mass immigration cutting wages, it's increasing the cost of living. British people are being squeezed between stationary salaries, rampant inflation, insane taxes and huge cost of living increases.


Also supply of houses and demand for workers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: