Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | just_observing's commentslogin

And in time it will be discovered that an FB employee 'accidentally' committed code to enable this data flow.

FB will 'apologise' and promise a 'full investigation'.

This is a well-worn track pioneered by Google, a track that leads to a trove of data and no fines, no penalties.


> I suspect the true total cost was a fair bit higher due to a hosting arrangement.

Untrue.

When the goal is to buy Blogger - a goal that is being progressed towards by Automattic - money saved on the Tumblr acquisition is useful.


Huh, OK. So you're saying the $3m price included the many months of continued hosting and bandwidth in Yahoo's datacenter? Quite a bad deal for Verizon if so, especially accounting for routine hardware maintenance.


> This was not like Theranos where he was straight up lying about a product working

She.


He.

He's talking about the WeWork guy, not the theranos woman. I think it's a strange sentence, but technically correct.


Ah. I stand corrected. Thank you.


The Guardian has gone downhill in the last few years, just like the rest of UK mainstream news reporting. They have rolled over to do whatever the Government wants not reporting - take Assange for example.

Their coverage is practically non-existent.

I used to buy The Guardian every day, then I subscribed digitally. And then when their reporting slid downhill, I stopped subscribing. I still read it - but block their data scraping scripts and all ads. They are not worth supporting IMO.


The more likely explanation is that people got tired of Assange's story and so the articles didn't get the clicks to justify covering them any more. The Guardian can get more clicks with a steady drip of vegan opinion pieces, stories laughing at Tories and the dreadfulness of brexit so that's what they'll do.

Same as the Telegraph will feed its readers "the glory of Boris", "forwards unto brexit" and "Good lord look what Corbyn said today, he's a dreadful little man isn't he?"

News organisations are slaves to their audiences and will just produce what their audiences want.


Pretty much. Click metrics like this might become the death of journalism. I used to read a lot of news but have stopped due to how every news paper became more and more about click bait and about appealing to the audience. Sure, I presume I too clicked on more news until I one day stopped reading entirely.


That's not a likely explanation when it comes to Assange. The Guardian has been terrible, and even its previous star reporter Glenn Greenwald (who won them a Pulitzer on the Snowden reporting) has been extremely critical. See for example https://theintercept.com/2019/01/02/five-weeks-after-the-gua...

Brought up again earlier this month: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1191681248453943296

That piece of fake news from the Guardian has been shared more than 25,000 times on Facebook.

I don't agree that honest reporting on Assange simply won't get clicks. But sensational fake news certainly does.


What makes you so sure it's fake news?

No-one really knows for sure whether or not that meeting took place.


Rough copy/paste

https://pastebin.com/iCtipMin

Apologies for any ads that got in.


Do they have their mobile devices with them? Electronic trail.

Did they appear in any photos? There's a trail.

Did they buy anything in that locality?

Did they call someone in that locality?

Just not using a card would seem to offer little protection unless they take care of at least the above.


Related to bias - I recently installed the plugin from https://mycognitivebias.com/ which explains a cognitive bias each time I open a new tab.

I cannot proclaim that this has altered my work or personal life yet, but it has opened my eyes to the number of them and the wide circumstances in which they occur.


Take a look at https://blokada.org/

It blocks ads in news and other apps for me.


Has it been working fine for you? It quite often stops working for me and I have to restart the service.

DNS66[1] has been working great for me but for some reason it misses a few ads unlike Blokada which never missed a single ad for me.

[1] https://github.com/julian-klode/dns66


I've had to give up on both which is a pain for me. Reason being that for some reason no connections work when it's running. As soon as I disable it internet works again. Haven't bothered figuring out what the issue is yet.


Spyware for all the family!


This would be more useful to me if when I hovered the link it told me more about what they actually make and the language they post in.

It's too random otherwise.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: