You are wrong in this regard. If you complain about "6 inches of whitespace on each side", you should read this on a proper device (i.e. a desktop computer) or just inject some CSS to fix the site (this is HN, after all).

But knowing that the article is AI generated is useful, because that tells me to not to read it.

> MacBook

That explains the writing style.

Yeah, this "article" is extremely badly written.

Yeah there is something funny going on with the scrolling.

Of course Linux clients in your network can be controlled by group policy. You just need to roll out a enterprise-grade distribution like red hat.

See for example:

https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_...

https://documentation.ubuntu.com/adsys/latest/how-to/use-gpo...

Why not just use the standard Linux tool bubblewrap?

The main reason is that in addition to sandboxing, I also wanted something similar to dev-containers where I can have a reproducible development environment. I guess that can also be achieved with Bubblewrap, but when you want to run containers anyway, it seems silly to not just use Podman.

Why not just use the standard Linux tool bubblewrap?

> agents know git far better than fossil.

That does not matter though. If you need an AI agent for SCM you are already lost and should take a step back.