Um... the question would be what the definition of "Party" is in the agreement. ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		ocdtrekkie on Nov 5, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Um... the question would be what the definition of "Party" is in the agreement. If a Party is a signatory country, than it wouldn't affect the GPL. If a "Party" is just "anyone", then it might?

andrewpi on Nov 5, 2015 [–]

Party = country here.

Taniwha on Nov 5, 2015 | [–]

so it might make it impossible for a court (a govt entity) from enforcing the GPL

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact