> And the fact that he has been known for good results in the past shows, at least to me that this is the real thing.
It means that the claims should be taken seriously, since he's competent in the field, but he might have made a mistake somewhere (even though, from what I understand of his report, the results seem clear. But since I'm not even a physicist, my opinion is worth peanuts).
It means that the claims should be taken seriously, since he's competent in the field, but he might have made a mistake somewhere (even though, from what I understand of his report, the results seem clear. But since I'm not even a physicist, my opinion is worth peanuts).
The peer reviewed confirmation of his previous discovery can be found here: http://www.superconductors.org/SDARTICL.pdf.