> I don't know Azure but do know AWS. PITR restores are not in seconds but in hours and you lose data.
You're talking about something different. I mean that if the node running Postgres goes down, your storage is simply connected to a new node (all this behind the scenes, of course).
> Quick feedback my side - $150/month to try something and then $500/month in production is not unreasonable for I think a fair number of use cases
$150/m just to play is way too much - IMO, $50/m would be much more reasonable. I also believe that $500/m for a tiny, single instance without HA is too much.
You're talking about something different. I mean that if the node running Postgres goes down, your storage is simply connected to a new node (all this behind the scenes, of course).
> Quick feedback my side - $150/month to try something and then $500/month in production is not unreasonable for I think a fair number of use cases
$150/m just to play is way too much - IMO, $50/m would be much more reasonable. I also believe that $500/m for a tiny, single instance without HA is too much.