...but you really have no idea.
You’re just speculating, in a way that conforms with how you’d like to interpret these events.
Which, to be fair, is what we’re all doing, with basically no information on what actually happened.
At this point, it’s all just the he-said-she-said from the Google PR machine.
I think in this case, there’s little reason for someone without bias to accept Google’s versions of events.
Maybe you’re right; if you’re not, maybe she’ll sue. Maybe not.
What is clear though is that what you think is likely, is probably not particularly indicative of what actually happened because, flat out, you have no idea.
None of us really do at this point.
To be fair, if she were preparing a wrongful termination suit, publicly commenting would be an unforced error.
...but you really have no idea.
You’re just speculating, in a way that conforms with how you’d like to interpret these events.
Which, to be fair, is what we’re all doing, with basically no information on what actually happened.
At this point, it’s all just the he-said-she-said from the Google PR machine.
I think in this case, there’s little reason for someone without bias to accept Google’s versions of events.
Maybe you’re right; if you’re not, maybe she’ll sue. Maybe not.
What is clear though is that what you think is likely, is probably not particularly indicative of what actually happened because, flat out, you have no idea.
None of us really do at this point.