It's not relevant to the premise of the article, though. I don't understand how someone committing a crime means we should change what gender we address them as.
Does this mean that, for people you like, you respect their gender, while you do the opposite for people you dislike?
Imagine if the Pope started spouting some completely insane nonsense, but did it ex cathedra. Are we to treat his ravings as fact since Catholicism holds that the Pope speaking ex cathedra is infallible? The editors wouldn't, and most of us wouldn't.
Gender ideology/wokeness/whatever you want to call it is in many senses religious, and certainly their claims of TWAW/TMAM are not factual: Our science and medicine come far short of being able to actually change anyone's sex. We can, through constant intervention, force the body to change a bit into one direction, but not much more.
Does this mean that, for people you like, you respect their gender, while you do the opposite for people you dislike?