Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is going to come across as contrarian view and get a lot of downvotes - OpenAI is being 'open'. Not Open Source, but Open. They are bringing AGI tech to the common person at affordable pricing. Before OpenAI, all the AI and its use cases were hidden behind closed doors at Google. By kickstarting the AI race, they have created high standards, new knowledge, and enough momentum to hold up the entire startup ecosystem and the US economy. They make hard choices and now the entire industry is moving forward because of their choices.


Google is actually the one that published the paper that made all this possible (just like they have done with tons of other breakthroughs)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_Is_All_You_Need


Papers aren’t products, and most of the authors - who did the actual work - are long gone.


I don’t have a horse in this race but I’d definitely like to see this viewpoint discussed more.

The open source angle probably matters more to the HN audience but it’s hard to argue that OpenAI hasn’t “opened up access to AI” to a vast global audience.

And that’s not to say that the means by which they’ve done so doesn’t still need some scrutiny.


By that definition every corporation aims to be open as possible…


We all had an understanding that open in OpenAI meant open source. Come on.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: