Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've gotten 15 other responses and the ideas I write and respond to inevitably blend together. So I apologize if I make some assumptions based on statements from other parts of the post that I have answered.

Regardless, I am a huge fan of the devil's advocate. You can talk about points without them being your complete world view. That's the assumption that we seem misaligned with. Just because I don't want all information to be free the moment it is published (or stolen) doesn't mean I want to abolish copyright.



Oh, being a devil's advocate is all fine. But when it's not clear what the advocate is advocating it stops being interesting.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: