Though I am as sad as anyone that Yahoo! effectively killed several good companies (Flickr and Delicious top my list of unfortunate casualties), I'd like to point out a couple of things.
First of all, when Yahoo, Google or any large company acquires a product, they don't necessarily do it for the product, but possibly for other technology. The goals of the acquiring company, the founders and the users are not necessarily aligned. This doesn’t mean the acquisition is bad for the company or founder, just bad for the users of the product or possibly for the founders if it goes in a direction he or she didn't like.
Second of all, founders leave for all sorts of reasons. It seems like some of these founders were frustrated by Yahoo!, but I have a feeling that founders in general would be frustrated by working for anyone in general. There's a personality that starts companies and there’s a personality that works for them.
Flickr was essentially killed. Yahoo is now trying to bring it back to life. Based on a completely unscientific survey of my friends it seems to be working.
First of all, when Yahoo, Google or any large company acquires a product, they don't necessarily do it for the product, but possibly for other technology. The goals of the acquiring company, the founders and the users are not necessarily aligned. This doesn’t mean the acquisition is bad for the company or founder, just bad for the users of the product or possibly for the founders if it goes in a direction he or she didn't like.
Second of all, founders leave for all sorts of reasons. It seems like some of these founders were frustrated by Yahoo!, but I have a feeling that founders in general would be frustrated by working for anyone in general. There's a personality that starts companies and there’s a personality that works for them.